>>>KRISHI VIGYAN KENDRA>>>
GHATKHED, AMRAVATI

line decor
HOME  ::  
line decor
DATABASE FORM

Mob No./Pho No

Address

Village ------------

Taluka ------------

District -----------

Age ----------------

Total Ara ---------

Education -------

Major Crop ------

Other Crop ------

Income -----------

Other Info. ------

Feedback -------

Fill all information ,then

 

 

 

 

 

List of Database Farmers

Name of Farmers Crop
Shri. Manish Dayaramji Nikale Soybean
Shri. Arjun Govind Jadhav Chana
Shri. Vipul Arunrao Kasturkar Soy / Chana
Shri. Shivdas Vithalrao Chavhan Tur / Jowar
Sau. Shashikala Sahebrao Karale Cotton
Shri. Rajendra Wamanrao Tayade Redgram
Shri. Balu Gamfuji Parise Cotton

Total 300 farmers list are available here

FEEDBACK AND DATABASE

Technical Feedback on the demonstrated technologies

S. No

Feed Back

Cotton

 

1

On demonstration plot the attack of Helicoverpa armigera was not observed upto 95 days.  So no need to monitor the bollworm to initiate control measures

2

Bt. Cotton helps to avoide or minimizes chemical sprays.  Thus contribution to cleaner environment & conservation of bioagents & biodiversity

3

According to farmers Bt cotton protects the crop from bollworms right from early days leading to a healthy crop.  Better boll retention & more profit.

4

Attack of Helicoverpa armigers was not observed at square and flowering stage of the crop due to which maximum no of squares are converted in to boll which helps in increasing the production of crop

5

Bt. Cotton required less no of spraying as compared to non Bt. Hybrid cotton.

6

Heavy attack of sucking pest was observed on the crop at 75 & 135 days after the sowing of the crop

7

Attack of sucking pest was not observed on the crop due to seed treatment of Imidaclopride upto 50 days.  But attack of sucking pest was noticed at 70 days after sowing of the crop.

8

Bt cotton required proper management and irrigation facility.  It is not suited under rainfed condition.  It also required more nutrients.

9

Number of bolls per plant was more in Bt. Cotton as compared to non Bt. Hybrid cotton.

10

Foliar nutrition is essential for Bt. Cotton.  (Water soluble fertilizers and micronutrients)

11

Spraying of insecticides should be avoided when there are maximum beneficial insects on the crop.

12

Farmers now know that indiscriminate use of insecticides diminishes the benefified insect and this should be avoided.

Oilseed
Soybean

 

1

Variety MAUS-71 liked by the farmers due to more height and more number of pods per plant.  But distance between two pods were more as compare to variety JS-335.

2

Variety MAUS – 71 was matured 5 to 8 days early than JS – 335

3

Attack of sucking pest was less on MAUS – 71 variety as compared to JS-335

4

Shattering was not observed in variety MAUS 71

5

Variety MAUS-71 was found tolerant to heavy rains

6

Grain size of variety MAUS-71 was bold as compared to JS-335

Safflower

 

1

Variety AKS-207 yielded more as compare to local check variety Bhima.

2

Variety AKS-207 matured early by 8 to 10 days than variety Bhima

3

Colour of seed of variety AKS – 207 was white and size of seed was also bold.

4

Problem of wilting was not observed in variety AKS-207

5

Attack of Aphids was less on AKS-207 as compared to local check variety bhima.

6

Spray of Dithane M-45, 12.50 gm/ha found effective for controlling alterneria leaf spot disease.

Pulses
Redgram

 

1

Variety BSMR-736 yielded more due to more number of pods per plant

2

Seed treatment of tricoderma viridae 4 gm/kg Rhizobium and PSB culture 200 gm/10 Kg shows good germination of crop.

3

Seed treatment of tricoderma viridae 4 gm/kg results no wilting.

4

Variety BSMR-736 matured late by 15 to 20 days than the local check variety ICPL-8863

5

Grain size of variety BSMR-736 was bold than local variety ICPL – 8863

6

Variety BSMR-736 found resistant to wilting.

7

Number of branches and number of pods per plant were more as compare to local check variety ICPL-8863.

8

Less attack of Helicoverpa were observed on variety BSMR-736 due to late flowering as compared to variety ICPL-8863

Bengalgram

 

1

Seed treatment with Tricoderma viridae 4 gm/kg of seed controlled wilting effectively.

2

Three sprays of neembased pesticide 12.50 ml/ha/spray, first spray of Neembased pesticide before flowering, second spray of Neembased pesticide + HaNPV 250 ml/ha/spray at flowering stage and third spray of Neembased pesticide + HaNPV at pod formation stage controlled Helicoverpa effectively.

3

Pheromore traps wsere effective for trapping the moth of Helicoverpa and also for judging the economic threshold level of Helicoverpa.

4

Two spray of Beauveria Bassiana 1 Kg/ha/spray also found effective for controlling Helicoverpa armigera.

FLD on Cotton IPM

 
1
Due to IPM demonstrations the farmers are now able to identify the beneficial and non beneficial insects
2
Spraying of insecticides should be avoided at an early stages of cotton to built up natural enemies’ population.
3
Reduction in the cost of cultivation by Rs. 405/- per ha. and increase in yield by 21.88 /haas compared to the farmers practice.
4
Reduction in the use of chemical pesticides  by 25 %
5
Reduction in the cost of pesticides by Rs.572/- per ha.
6
Additional profit due to increase in yield is Rs.3841/- per ha.
7
Total additional profit due to IPM demonstration is Rs.4353/- per ha.
8
Due to IPM demonstration in cotton ecosystem there was a increase in the no. of bird population and nests built in the crops.
9
Conservation of natural fauna & enhancement in the activity of natural enemies (Predators & parasites).

FLD On Bengalgram

 

1
Increased yield by 10.56 % in IPM as compared to non IPM.
2
Average% pod infestation of Helicoverpa armigera was reduced in IPM ( 10.11%)as compared to non      IPM (20.08%).
3
Get additional net profit of Rs.4286/- per ha in IPM as compared to non IPM.
4
Reduced cost of cultivation by Rs. 500-550/ha in IPM as compared to non IPM.
5
The farmers are now able to identify different stages of Helicoverpa armigera  and natural enemies.

FLD on Brinjal

 

1
By adoption of IPM technology resulted in reduction of number of sprays to 4-5 from 10-12 spraysin non IPM field.
2
Increased yield by 22.53 % in IPM as compared to non IPM.
3
Reduced cost of cultivation by 12-13% in IPM as compared to non IPM.
4
Get additional net profit of Rs.27490/- per ha in IPM as compared to non IPM
5
Adoption of IPM technology enabled the farmers to identify pests of brinjal, natural enemies like Coccinelids,Chrysoperla,Syrphids and other predators & parasitesobserved in brinjal ecosystem and avoidance of mixtures of pesticides.

FLD on Brinjal

 

1

Variety MBH-11 gives the good response to the fertilizer

2

Farmers get the 24.68% higher yield with good quality due to adoption of recommended dose of fertilizer

3

The application of split fertilizer doses increase the no of picking ultimately increases the yield

FLD on Chilly
 

1

The spray of Planofix protected the flower drop which increases the yield per unit area

2
Farmers get the 22.21% higher yield with good quality due to adoption of recommended spray of planofix

 

About us, KVK Mandate, Report, Line department, Publications, Farmers Feedback, Departments, News, Database, SAC, RTI Act-2005, Impact, Module, Soil Testing Lab, Wheather Forcast Copyrght: 2006, KVKG, Amravati & Design by :Mr. Pratik p. Ghogare, Programme Assistant ( Computer), KVK Ghatkhed, Amravati. 9423154300